CJWP

Chin Jurn Wor Ping/Chien Jin He Ping/Moving Forward for Peace

CJWP header image 1

The Demonization of China ... on being chinese in the us and watching media coverage of the olympics

August 09, 2008 · 0 comments

Originally written April 8, 2008:

The Demonization of China …

on being chinese in the us and watching media coverage of the olympics

by Diana Pei Wu

April 8, 2008

SAN FRANCISCO - I was walking out of San Francisco City Hall yesterday on a lunch break, in between testifying against the reappointment of a racist public officer and hearings on public policies that will open the door wider to the further gentrification of the working class neighborhoods of this City. There was a rally on the front steps of City Hall, like many days. This one was Students for a Free Tibet protesting the Olympics in China. It was picturesque, and emblematic of this city known for supposedly progressive politics - the flags and the monks, the students with headbands, the marble steps, the gilt lettering framing the scene, the squadron of police across the street.

I think it’s a hard thing for us - people of Chinese descent in the US, seeds of the diaspora, boat people of the dragon, sometimes many times removed through other countries, concentration camps or refugee camps - to paint media coverage of China and the Olympics in simple binaries because we see the complexity of issues and positions. We have double vision, double luck, sometimes double pain. sometimes triple or quadruple ….

In the media coverage on this issue over this year, I see clear China bashing that harkens back to the racist narratives of the 1890s. And I think the actions to boycott the Olympics, as are the demands that China do this or that on an international foreign policy level, are indicative that there has not been any attempt to have the kind of serious discussions that diplomacy is ostensibly about. That is, China is not to be taken as an equal, an entity with whom one has dialogue. The people in the West feel entitled to simply demand that China do This or That, as if China were a child to be bullied into compliance. Historically, we on the other side of modernity have always called this paternalism, colonialism and imperialism.

I see that China clearly abuses those who work towards social justice, Helen Zia’s experience notwithstanding (Zia, SF Chronicle, April 8, 2008). The official line is still that Tiananmen did not happen, and the truth is still that the Chinese government is extremely oppressive - military actions in minority areas and in poor areas is extremely common.

I also see a rising middle class in China, one that is mostly sold out to capitalism as the cure-all to dictatorship or communist authoritarianism, confusing capitalism with democracy. At the same time, there are those who work dedicatedly and stealthily for workers’ rights in the economic free trade zones of ShenZhen, as Helen Zia mentions, and who struggle within government bureaucracies to make more humane policies (such as friends in the Health and Environment ministries). And the workers, and the environment, in China, are truly the ones bearing the cost of the move towards capitalism and this Olympic effort.

I see, finally, this weird thing that happens with many colonial and imperial situations - the appropriation of regional or ethnic minorities’ cultural traits to represent the nation, while squashing and obliterating those same regional or ethnic identities and peoples. So why is the Tibetan ram the symbol of China? And why were the the Olympics opened with “folk dancers” - Han Chinese doing a Tibetan dance in Beijing? Those are the kinds of things that i understand to be extremely insulting to the minority or ethnic group in question and a serious misrepresentation of historical and contemporary relationships and power between regions and ethnic or racial groups. The US does it with Black culture, Mexico with indigenous culture, Brazil with Afro-Brazilian culture, Turkey with Kurdish independence day. Think jazz, blues, food, aztec symbology and language, samba, capoeira.

The other part that’s insulting is that some of the folks work for justice here in the US, or wherever they are based, some of these liberal and progressive people are critical of their own governments’ roles in creating inequities, abroad, and also in their own countries of residence. Some are not and they just buy into what has been already called a global imperialist logic. And others have called that hypocrisy.

I have to say, for folks in my family, in the circles of my extended family and extensive community, it’s a big deal that it’s gonna be in China. It’s like this extended national pride thing. I may not feel the same way, but it’s very real, and very beautiful. It is worth observing, mentioning, honoring.

It is not a dichotomy, to critique China for human rights abuses which are real, and at the same time support the opportunities this is creating in China – and in the Chinese diaspora – for more interesting dialogues. The Old Left used to call it political education …

We know that whatever profits are made for infrastructure built up in this period will go to the already-rich. They will be Chinese, Taiwanese, Japanese, U.S., European. And we knew that thousands of poor people were displaced for the Olympic stadium to be built there. We also know that African American homeowners were threatened, cajoled and bribed to sell their homes and land so the Olympic stadium in Atlanta could be built. Those that refused to comply were burned out. The only thing that didn’t happen were crosses on the front lawn.

So what does that mean? Will I be watching the Olympics? Will I be celebrating with my compatriot workers in restaurants and garment factories, domestics and youth? Will I be present at the pro-Tibet rallies like the one at City Hall yesterday? I’m really not sure yet. I’ll probably keep track of what’s going on. What I know is, before, during and afterwards, I’ll still be walking in and out of City Hall to and from one of the many meetings I attend there, fighting for policies that represent and support the jobs, lives, housing and basic education of the poorest people in one of the richest cities in the richest nation in the world.

Diana Pei Wu is a co-founder of Chin Jurn Wor Ping (Moving Forward for Peace), a San Francisco Bay Area network of progressive Chinese Americans, and faculty lecturer in Ethnic Studies at the University of California, Berkeley.

→ 0 comments Tags:

PacRen decision at City Council, Tuesday, September 18

September 17, 2007 · 0 comments

Please come out and help show Oakland’s City Council that affordable housing is important!

Dear Allies,

Thank you for your support over the 4 plus years in fighting for housing justice for Oakland Chinatown’s Pacific Renaissance families and low-income communities.

At this Tuesday’s Oakland City Council hearing, Councilmembers will vote on approving the settlement agreement reached that will result in preserving the 50 Pacific Renaissance units as affordable ownership AND develop 50 new low-income rental housing units in Chinatown AND pay back the City of Oakland its entire attorneys fees and costs. Here’s the link to the report with more information about the settlement agreement, http://clerkwebsvr1.oaklandnet.com/attachments/17227.pdf

We have recently learned that there may be opposition to this deal, in part, due to misinformation being spread in the community. We need your help again to FINALLY WIN housing justice for Chinatown and the Pacific Renaissance tenant families! Here’s how you can help:

  • Contact City Councilmembers and let them know that you are supporting the Pacific Renaissance settlement—it’s a win/win for the community and the City of Oakland.
  • Come to the Council hearing, 9/18, 6:30 pm, to support the settlement agreement.
  • Attend the community Press Conference with Mayor Dellums and others on 9/19, 11-12 at Oakland City Hall, Hearing Room 2.

For more information, please contact Adam Gold, Just Cause Oakland, 763-5877, adam@justcauseoakland.org OR Roger Kim, APEN, 834-8920, roger@apen4ej.org.

Pat Kernighan, 238-7002 pkernighan@oaklandnet.com Nancy Nadel, 238-7003 nnadel@oaklandnet.com Jean Quan, 238-7004 jquan@oaklandnet.com Ignacio Dela Fuente, 238-7005 idelafuente@oaklandnet.com Desley Brooks, 238-7006 dbrooks@oaklandnet.com Larry Reid, 238-7007 lreid@oaklandnet.com Henry Chang, 238-7008 cityochang@aol.com

→ 0 comments Tags:

Join us this Saturday to the Commemoration of the 4-Year Struggle at Pacific Renaissance

April 23, 2007 · 0 comments

  • Pacific Renaissance Plaza
  • Oakland Chinatown
  • 9th St, between Webster + Franklin
  • Saturday, April 28, 2007
  • 10:30 am

Four years ago, Oakland’s social justice community came together to support the Pacific Renaissance Plaza families who were being evicted from their homes. Please join us as we commemorate the families who stood up for housing rights and as we recommit to realizing justice for the Pacific Renaissance tenants and Oakland Chinatown.

It’s been four years since tenant families, community groups, and the City of Oakland sued the Pacific Renaissance developers. Last May, the parties entered into a tentative settlement agreement that would have resulted in preserving the 50 affordable housing units as permanently affordable housing for the Chinatown community. Yet the wheels of justice currently turn slowly, while many of the Pacific Renaissance families face uncertain futures.

The Pacific Renaissance units represent the last remaining option for affordable housing in Chinatown—a community that is experiencing a serious affordable housing crisis. It also represents unmet promises made to Chinatown. Beginning in the 1970s, community leaders fought to secure community benefits from the Pacific Renaissance project, which received over $30 million in public subsidies. With the documented loss of thousands of Chinatown’s affordable housing units due to redevelopment, affordable housing at Pacific Renaissance was a key community demand.

With your continued help, we will write a different chapter of history on the treatment of Chinatown residents and realize justice for the Pacific Renaissance families. We look forward to seeing you on April 28th.

In peace and solidarity,

Chin Jurn Wor Ping, Oakland Tenants Union, Just Cause Oakland, Asian Pacific Environmental Network, East Bay Asian Local Development Corp, East Bay Asian Consortium, ACORN, East Bay Community Law Center, East Bay Housing Organizations, Movement Strategy Center, Alameda County Central Labor Council, Urban Strategies Council, Siegel & Yee; California Affordable Housing Law Project, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky, & Walker LLP; Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance, SEIU Local 1021, League of Women Voters, East Bay Alliance for Sustainable Economy

For more information, contact Eric Chang :: wokwhiz _at_ sbcglobal _dot_ net :: 650.580.7719

→ 0 comments Tags:

Welcome to the CJWP blog!

April 23, 2007 · 0 comments

For those who don’t know, CJWP (Chin Jurn Wor Ping/Chien Jin He Ping/Moving Forward for Peace) is an intergenerational alliance of people of Taiwanese, Chinese and Hong Kong heritage, working together in the Bay Area for peace and social justice.

We empower and build leadership within our communities through education, grassroots organizing and activism on local and global issues.

We build community strength and resist systems of injustice by exploring our shared, diverse heritages, and by building alliances with other people of color involved in social justice.

The above is from our Mission Statement, which can be found on the main CJWP Web site. We’re starting this blog so we can do more frequent updates on our actions, including the upcoming 4th Year Commemoration of the struggle for affordable housing at Pacific Renaissance Plaza in Oakland Chinatown which is coming up this Saturday, April 28, at 10:30 a.m. at the Pacific Renaissance Plaza in Oakland Chinatown.

→ 0 comments Tags: